| What's New | About AIFS | Search |
| Media | Research | Information | Databases | Publications | Lists | Conferences | Seminars | Courses | Links |
Helen Glezer and Ilene Wolcott
This paper is also available in PDF (size=175K) format . You will need an Acrobat Reader which is free from the Adobe Systems Web site:
http://www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html
Initial findings from a new Institute study highlight the ways that parents' workforce participation is influenced by the values and preferences they hold for combining work and family life.In the 1990s we are seeing rapid changes occurring in the nature, structure and organisation of work. People's decisions and choices about workforce participation and working hours are made in the context of social and economic opportunities and constraints. At a personal level this translates into the values and priorities people hold regarding their family life and their income earning requirements. Sometimes this results in compromises between actual and preferred working hours.
The shift from the traditional notion of men as sole breadwinners and women
as caring for the children at home and doing the housework is illustrated in
responses to the questions asked in the Institute's Australian Family Life
Course Study about the values people hold.
Only one in four (23 per cent) of both men and women agreed with the statement:
"A husband's job is to earn the money, a wife's is to look after the home and
family".
Around two-thirds of men (65 per cent) and women (69 per cent) also agreed that:
"Both partners should contribute to the household income".
When it came to the question asked of couples: "Who takes the main responsibility
for being the economic provider?", six in ten men and women said that the male
partner took more responsibility, three in ten couples agreed that such a responsibility
was shared equally, and the remaining couples (just under one in ten) said that
the woman was the main breadwinner.
Workforce participation
The age of youngest child clearly affects workforce participation rates for
mothers, but is almost negligible for fathers.
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS 1997), overall in Australia
in 1997:
Men's workforce participation and their preferences about working hours have
historically been consistent with the fact that full-time work over the life
course has been both the norm and the preferred option for men.
However, the economic climate in recent decades, combined with continuing industrial
restructuring, has altered the employment opportunities and standard working
hours for men.
Overall, 68 per cent of employee fathers and 70 per cent of self-employed fathers
were working more than 41 hours per week. About 29 per cent of employees were
working longer than 51 hours per week, but almost half (48 per cent) of the
selfemployed worked these longer hours.
Not surprisingly, whether they were employees or self-employed, men who worked
long hours desired to work standard working hours - generally considered to
be around 40 hours a week.
Mothers' participation and preferences
Hakim (1997) argues that there is greater diversity in women's workforce preferences
and patterns of participation than men's, which are more uniform. Given the
increase in part-time employment, casual work and non-standard working hours,
Hakim stresses the need to define what is actually meant by "part-time" work
and suggests the following definitions of working hours:
The Australian Family Life Course Study found
a strong preference among women with dependent children for part-time work.

Actual hours in paid work in relation to preferred working hours for women with children under 12 years is shown in Figures 2 and 3.


The perceptions of mothers whose youngest child is under 18 years and who
are not currently in paid work are of relevance to this discussion of work and
family. These are illustrated in Figure 4.

As demonstrated above, for women with family responsibilities, workforce participation
and preference is likely to change according to family circumstances.
When we talk of preferences we touch on fundamental and entrenched attitudes
and beliefs relating to a sense of identity, elements of self-esteem, and how
rewards and contributions in personal, family and community domains are defined
and perceived.
The salience and balance between the personal, family and social components
of our lives are always changing and differ for men and women at different stages
of the life cycle.
One indication of the intrinsic value of paid work versus other aspects of life
was revealed in the responses of parents with children under 18 years to the
question: "If you had a reasonable income without having to work, would you
still prefer to have a paid job?". Seventy-two per cent of fathers and 64 per
cent of mothers indicated that they would still prefer to work, thus indicating
a strong degree of work attachment and the importance of employment to a sense
of personal identity in both men and women.
These finding from the Institute's Australian Family Life Course Study illustrate
the diversity among women with children in the choices they make to combine
income earning with family responsibilities. The different ways families organise
their work and family roles need to be recognised in the provision of services
to families as well as in workplace negotiations and practice.
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 1997, Labour Force
Australia, April, Catalogue No. 6203.0.
Hakim, C. (1997), Key Issues in Women's Work: Female Heterogeneity and the
Polarisation of Women's Employment, Athlone, London.
ISBN 0 642 195390
ISSN 1038-0507
ABOUT THE STUDY
The Australian Institute of Family Studies Australian Family Life Course Study
conducted in 1996, is a random national telephone survey of just under 2,000
respondents aged between 25 and 50 years. Work and family issues across the
life course was a major theme within the study.
Return to Publications Menu
|
AIFS Home |
Email
queries to
webmaster@aifs.gov.au
|
Copyright, privacy,
disclaimer
|
Site map Australian Institute of Family Studies, Level 20, 485 La Trobe Street, Melbourne Vic 3000, Australia. Tel: (03) 9214 7888. Fax: (03) 9214 7839. URL: http://www.aifs.gov.au/ |